The utility of USB microscope for assessment of Raynaud’s phenomenon patients in rheumatology practice
PDF
PDF BG

Keywords

USB microscope
nailfold capillaries
Raynaud’s phenomenon

How to Cite

Lambova, S., Stoilov, N., & Boyadzhieva, V. (2024). The utility of USB microscope for assessment of Raynaud’s phenomenon patients in rheumatology practice. Rheumatology (Bulgaria), 31(4), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.35465/31.4.2023.pp28-41

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the utility of USB microscope (DinoLite) for evaluation of patients with primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) in rheumatic diseases, , using magnification 200x.

Methods: The study represents retrospective analysis of capillaroscopic images of 53 patients with RP – primary and secondary in the context of systemic sclerosis (SSc) or other rheumatic diseases i.e., undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), prescleroderma and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Capillaroscopic images are obtained from 8 fingers (II÷V bilaterally) using USB microscope (DinoLite) at magnification 200x. Capillary diameters were measured (arterial, venous and apical loop) as well as the number of capillaries per millimeter and capillary length. The capillaroscopic images were categorized into the following groups i.e., 1. absence of microangiopathy: i) normal pattern, ii) nonspecific changes; 2. presence of microangiopathy i.e., “scleroderma/ scleroderma-like” pattern.

Results: Images suitable for analysis with good visibility that permit analysis of the major capillaroscopic parameters were available in all patients (100%). Among 53 included patients, 14 patients were with SSc, 12 cases with primary RP, and 27 patients with secondary RP in other connective tissue diseases  (22 patients with UCTD, 1 – with prescleroderma and 4 patients with SLE). „Scleroderma“ pattern was detected in 11 patients with SSc and in all these cases the capillaroscopic images were classifiable into one of the three distinct validated phases i.e., “early”, ”active” and ”late”. Presence of microvascular changes type “scleroderma-like” pattern was detected also in 17 among 27 patients with other connective tissue diseases. In primary RP patients, capillaroscopy revealed either normal pattern or nonspecific findings, but without features of microangiopathy.

Conclusion: Capillaroscopic images of good quality, which could be analyzed and interpreted, are usually obtained using USB microscope. This permits evaluation of the major capillaroscopic parameters including quantitative measurement of the capillary diameters, capillary density and length. Assessment of the degree of microvascular changes i.e., staging of microangiopathy is also applicable and was possible in all cases with microangiopathy. The available software although less sophisticated vs those of videocapillaroscopes, providess the opportunity for adequate analysis of capillaroscopic parameters. The images obtained via USB microscope using magnification 200x are easily classified into “scleroderma”/“scleroderma-like” pattern, non-specific changes and normal findings using also the software of the device. Thus, USB microscopes using standard, 200x magnification could be suggested as an alternative of videocapillaroscopes in every day rheumatology practice especially in low-budget cases.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35465/31.4.2023.pp28-41
PDF
PDF BG

References

Belch J, Carlizza A, Carpentier PH, Constans J, Khan F WJ. ESVM guidelines – the diagnosis and management of Raynaud ’ s phenomenon Writing group. 2017;46:413–23.

Lambova S. Capillaroscopy in rheumatology - norm and pathology. Plovdiv, Bulgaria: Lax Book; 2021.

Filaci G, Cutolo M, Basso M, Murdasa G, Derchi L GR et al. Long-term treatment of patients affected by systemic sclerosis with cyclosporin A. J Rheumatol. 2001;40(12):1431–2.

Aschwanden M, Daikeler T, Jaeger KA, Thalhammer C, Gratwohl A M-CM and TA. Rapid improvement of nailfold capillaroscopy after intense immunosuppression for systemic sclerosis and mixed connective tissue disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(7):1057–9.

Caramaschi P, Volpe A, Pieropan S, Tinazzi I, Mahamid H, Bambara LM, et al. Cyclophosphamide treatment improves microvessel damage in systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28(4):391–5.

Bellando-Randone S, Lepri G, Bruni C, Blagojevic J, Radicati A, Cometi L, et al. Combination therapy with Bosentan and Sildenafil improves Raynaud’s phenomenon and fosters the recovery of microvascular involvement in systemic sclerosis. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(1):127–32.

Miniati I, Guiducci S, Conforti ML, Rogai V, Fiori G, Cinelli M, et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation improves microcirculation in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(1):94–8.

Maricq HR LE. Patterns of finger capillary abnormalities in connective tissue disease by “wide-field” microscopy. Arthritis Rheum. 1973;16(5):619–28.

Maricq HR, LeRoy EC, D’Angelo WA, Medsger TA, Rodnan GP, Sharp GC, et al. Diagnostic potential of in vivo capillary microscopy in scleroderma and related disorders. Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23(2):183–9.

Maricq HR, Harper FE, Khan MM, Tan EM LE. Microvascular abnormalities as possible predictors of disease subsets in Raynaud phenomenon and early connective tissue disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1983;1(3):195–205.

van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M TA et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(11):1747–55.

Bertolazzi C, Cutolo M, Smith V, Gutierrez M. State of the art on nailfold capillaroscopy in dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;47(3):432–44.

Furtado RNV, Pucinelli MLC, Cristo V V., Andrade LEC, Sato EI. Scleroderma-like nailfold capillaroscopic abnormalities are associated with anti-U1-RNP antibodies and Raynaud’s phenomenon in SLE patients. Lupus. 2002;11(1):35–41.

Lambova S, Müller-Ladner U. Capillaroscopic pattern in systemic lupus erythematosus and undifferentiated connective tissue disease: What we still have to learn? Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(3):689–95.

Lambova SN. Scleroderma-like pattern in various rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol. 2020;47(6):942.

Lambova SN, Müller-Ladner U. Capillaroscopic pattern in inflammatory arthritis. Microvasc Res. 2012;83(3):318–22.

Rajaei A, Dehghan P, Amiri A. Nailfold capillaroscopy in 430 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Casp J Intern Med. 2017;8(4):269–75.

van Roon AM, Huisman CC, Van Roon AM, Zhang D, Stel AJ, Smit AJ, et al. Abnormal nailfold capillaroscopy is common in patients with connective tissue disease and associated with abnormal pulmonary function tests. J Rheumatol. 2019;46(9):1109–16.

Lambova S. The utility of USB capillaroscope for assessment of Raynaud’s phenomenon patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80 (Suppl.:1256–7.

Berks M, Dinsdale G, Taylor C, Herrick AL, Marjanovic E, Murray A. Concise report Comparison between low cost USB nailfold capillaroscopy and videocapillaroscopy : a pilot study. Rheumatol. 2021;60(8):3862–7.

Bhakuni DS, Vasdev V, Garg MK, Narayanan K, Jain R. Nailfold capillaroscopy by digital microscope in an Indian population with systemic sclerosis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2012;15:95–101.

Vasdev V, Bhakuni DS, Bhayana A, Kamboj P. Nailfold capillaroscopy: A cost effective practical technique using digital microscope. Indian J Rheumatol [Internet]. 2011;6(4):185–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0973-3698(11)60205-7

Jakhar D, Grover C SA. Nailfold capillaroscopy with USB dermatoscope: A cross‑sectional study in healthy adults. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2020;86(1):33–8.

Abhijit Desai S, Nayak CS. Nailfold capillaroscopy as a prognostic marker for connective tissue diseases: An observational clinico-epidemiological study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2023;28:1–8.

Chanprapaph K, Fakprapai W, Limtong P. Nailfold Capillaroscopy With USB Digital Microscopy in Connective Tissue Diseases : A Comparative Study of 245 Patients and Healthy Controls. 2021;8(August):1–12.

Mosca M, Neri R, Bombardieri S. Undifferentiated connective tissue diseases (UCTD): A review of the literature and a proposal for preliminary classification criteria. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1999;17(5):615–20.

LeRoy EC, Medsger J. Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(7):1573–6.

Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ RN et al. The 1982 Revised Criteria for the Classification of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 1982;25(11):1271–7.

Maverakis E, Patel F, Kronenberg DG, Chung L, Fiorentino D AY et al. International consensus criteria for the diagnosis of Raynaud’s phenomenon. J Autoimmun. 2014;48–49:60–5.

Schmidt JA, Caspary L, von Bierbrauer A, Ehrly AM, Jünger M, Jung F LH. Standardisierung der Nagelfalz-Kapillar-mikroskopie in der Routinediagnostik. Vasa. 1997;25:5–10.

Kabasakal Y, Elvins DM, Ring EFJ, McHugh NJ. Quantitative nailfold capillaroscopy findings in a population with connective tissue disease and in normal healthy controls. Ann Rheum Dis. 1996;55(8):507–12.

Smith V, Vanhaecke A, Herrick AL, Distler O, Guerra MG, Denton CP, et al. Fast track algorithm: How to differentiate a “scleroderma pattern” from a “non-scleroderma pattern.” Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18(11):102394.

Maricq HR. Widefield capillary microscopy. technique and rating scale for abnormalities seen in scleroderma and related disorders. Arthritis Rheum. 1981;24(9):1159–65.

Cutolo M, Sulli A, Pizzorni C AS. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy assessment of microvascular damage in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(1):155–60.

Lambova SN, Mueller-Ladner U. Inhomogeneity of capillaroscopic findings in systemic sclerosis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2020; 23(2):207-15.

Ingegnoli F, Ughi N, Dinsdale G, Orenti A, Boracchi P, Allanore Y, et al. An international SUrvey on non-iNvaSive tecHniques to assess the mIcrocirculation in patients with RayNaud’s phEnomenon (SUNSHINE survey). Rheumatol Int. 2017;37(11):1879–90.

Eden M, Murray A, Taylor C, Herrick AL. Comment on: Nailfold capillaroscopy: A survey of current UK practice and “next steps” to increase uptake among rheumatologists: Reply. Rheumatol (United Kingdom). 2023;62(10):E305.

Ma Z, Mulder DJ, Gniadecki R, Cohen Tervaert JW, Osman M. Methods of Assessing Nailfold Capillaroscopy Compared to Video Capillaroscopy in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis—A Critical Review of the Literature. Diagnostics. 2023;13(13):1–13.

Dinsdale G, Roberts C, Moore T, Manning J, Berks M, Allen J, et al. Nailfold capillaroscopy - How many fingers should be examined to detect abnormality? Rheumatol. 2019;58(2):284–8.

Radic M, Snow M, Frech TM, Saketkoo LA, Cutolo M S V. Consensus-based evaluation of dermatoscopy versus nailfold videocapillaroscopy in Raynaud’s phenomenon linking USA and Europe: a European League against Rheumatism study group on microcirculation in rheumatic diseases project. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020;38(Suppl.):S132–6.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.